What is the evidence brought forward in proof of this charge? One would suppose that the evidence would be clear and decisive; that cases would be cited of the practice of af'fusion by the Anabaptists of England, and records would be produced of the change from sprink ling to immersion by the Anabaptist churches. But we find nothing of the sort.' Not a single instance has been cited where any Anabaptist in Eng land practiced sprinkling or pouring, or where any Anabaptist church changed its practice. The re markable claim is made that a practice was universal among a people, when not one of them has been shown to have observed any such What sort of history is that?