That is the prime reason why the inspector-general, a mere comedy, has such a hold on the Russian people and occupies so important a place in Russian literature. And that is why a Russian critic says, Russia possesses only one comedy, the inspector-general. The second reason is the brilliancy and originality with which this national theme was executed. Gogol was above all else the artist. He was not a radical, nor even a liberal. He was strictly conservative. While hating the bureaucracy, yet he never found fault with the system itself or with the autocracy. Like most born artists, he was strongly individualistic in temperament, and his satire and ridicule were aimed not at causes, but at effects. Let but the individuals act morally, and the system, which Gogol never questioned, would work beau tifully. This conception caused Gogol to concentrate his best efforts upon delineation of character. It was the characters that were to be revealed, their actions to be held up to scorn and ridicule, not the conditions which created the characters and made them act as they did. If any lesson at all was to be drawn from the play it was not a sociological lesson, but a moral one. The indi vidual who sees himself mirrored in it may be moved to self-purgation; society has nothing to learn from it. Yet the play lives because of the social message it carries. The creation proved greater than the creator. The author of the Revisor was a poor critic of his own work. The Russian people rejected his estimate and put their own upon it. They knew their officials and they entertained no illusions concerning their regener ation so long as the system that bred them continued to live. Nevertheless, as a keen satire and a striking ex position of the workings of the hated system itself, they hailed the Revisor with delight. And as such it has re mained graven in Russia's conscience to this day.